(Must see videos at the end of this article)
In previous articles I’ve discussed the “mystery religion” of Babylon. We saw that once God scattered this false religion at the Tower of Babel, it spread to other countries across the globe (Genesis 11:1-9).
But what is a mystery religion?
A mystery religion is a religion that hides its agenda through a hierarchy in order to gain control over people. That hierarchy looks like this:
Since the AGENDA of a mystery religion is too heinous for any ordinary man to accept, the top of the hierarchy (Satanists) hide their agenda through layers. As members of the Mystery religion prove themselves “worthy”, they are promoted to higher levels in the hierarchy.
The “broad masses” or laity have no idea what the agenda of the mystery religion is. The “Initiates” are given pieces of the puzzle but are kept in line by the “Ruling Body”. The men at the top or “Key Men” are Satanists.
In Misdirection I showed you how the mystery religion of Nimrod and Semiramis spread throughout the world but CONSOLIDATED in Rome. Rome became the SEAT of Babylon expressing itself through the Roman Catholic Church.
We can actually follow its treacheries throughout time. In The Society of Jesus I showed you how these treacheries came to a head with Martin Luther “protesting” the Roman Catholic Church.
Every REFORMER of the day recognized the SYSTEM OF INIQUITY. This system had been going on since Nimrod. Antichrist was a PERSON, but he was also a system. That is why the Apostle John could say:
Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the ANTICHRIST is coming, even now MANY ANTICHRISTS have come. This is how we know it is the last hour.
Diverting Attention
The Pope was beside himself. Due to the Reformation, the spotlight was on him. There had to be a way to divert attention away from Rome.
There was.
In 1585 A.D., Francisco Ribera, a priest in the Society of Jesus came up with a doctrine we now call FUTURISM. This doctrine was created for the sole purpose of protecting the Papacy.
Ribera spun his tale around the 70 weeks of Daniel (Daniel 9:24-27). He said that the first 69 weeks of Daniel’s prophecy ended with the baptism of Jesus in 27 A.D.. He said that the 70th week wouldn’t take place until the end of the age. He said that the antichrist would be a single person (not the papal system) and wouldn’t rule until the very end of time.
Today this doctrine is known as the Pre-Tribulation Rapture theory.
Of course Ribera’s doctrine was NOT received by the reformers of his day and it was soon forgotten.
Then in 1826, Dr. S.R. Maintland, the librarian to the Archbishop of Canterbury, discovered Ribera’s book in his library. He translated it and published it in 1826. Dr. Maintland also wrote a prophetic pamphlet showing his contempt for the Reformation (Martin Luther). He did not believe that the papacy was the predicted System of Antichrist or Beast of Daniel or the Apocalypse (Revelation).
Then John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) a brilliant and well-educated man from Glasgow, Scotland, magnified Maintland’s errors. Darby read the pamphlets that Maintland produced and was persuaded.
Darby was the founder of the Plymouth Brethren. He thought this was a great revelation—with such a simplified view of Bible prophecy, there was no need to understand the historic application. It was all in the future!
Darby wrote several volumes on this new understanding of prophecy. He influenced many people, including Cyrus Ingerson Scofield (1843-1921) who incorporated Darby’s views in the Scofield Reference Bible in 1909.
Simultaneously to Maintland, a book called The Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty by Emmanuel Lacunza (1731-1801), a Jesuit priest from Chili, was translated into English and published in London in 1827 by Reverend Edward Irving (1792-1834). It contained the first known reference of a secret “rapture”.
Irving presented Lacunza’s work as a new revelation from God. Irving became one of the most eloquent preachers of his time. In 1828, Irving’s open-air meetings in Scotland drew crowds of ten thousand people. In March 1830, he held a series of prophecy meetings in which he introduced Lacunza’s ideas about the Rapture.
In 1830 in Port Glasgow, Scotland, a 15-year-old named Margaret MacDonald claimed she had received a vision of a pre-tribulation rapture. Robert Norton (1807-1883), recorded Margaret’s prophecies and published them in a book, The Restoration of Apostles and Prophets in the Catholic Apostolic Church. It isn’t clear as to whether Margaret ever heard of Irving’s translation of Lacunza’s book, but Norton wrote that Miss MacDonald was the first to advance the idea of pre-tribulation rapture (Margaret MacDonald’s vision is recorded in The Incredible Cover Up).
The rapture doctrine today is quite different from the rapture doctrine that Lacunza, MacDonald and Norton promoted. These nineteenth century believers proclaimed a partial rapture in which only a select portion of the body of believers would be chosen. The identity of this elite quickly became a focal point of confusion and disagreement.
Lacunza claimed that only those believers who partake of the sacrament of the Eucharist would be raptured; Miss MacDonald said the rapture would take away only those who were filled with the Spirit; and Norton claimed that only Christians who were sealed by the Holy Ghost with the laying on of hands would be raptured.
In the years that followed, the same John Nelson Darby mentioned earlier developed the teaching into its current form. It was Darby who introduced this new teaching into the main current of prophetic interpretation.
Also in 1970, Hal Lindsey further popularized it through his book, The Late Great Planet Earth— and Tim LaHaye through the Left Behind book and movie series. Both of these men are now known to be Jesuits of Rome (see the video below).
What the Bible Says
No where in my studies do I find the idea of a SECRET pre-tribulation rapture.
The Bible DOES teach the concept of a rapture, BUT only as it coincides with the Day of the Lord or Day of Atonement at the end of the tribulation (the Bible does not use the term “rapture”).
The rapture comes at the LAST TRUMPET:
For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the TRUMP OF GOD: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
The rapture occurs at the Last Trump which is the Feast of Trumpets. The Feast of Trumps coincides with the Day of the Lord (Day of Atonement) in that it occurs just 10 days before it on Christ’s prophetic calendar. We understand this when we study the Feasts of the Lord.
Falling Away From Sound Doctrine
Scripture tells us that there will be a FALLING AWAY:
Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day (THE DAY OF THE LORD) shall not come, except there come a FALLING AWAY first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
What is the falling away?
It’s the church FALLING AWAY from apostolic truth!
The early church NEVER believed in a pre-trib rapture. The Reformers NEVER believed in a pre-trib rapture.
Only the CURRENT CHURCH believes in a pre-trib rapture. It has fallen away from a post tribulation, SINGLE EVENT rapture and coming of the Lord.
The apostasy of a Pre-tribulation Rapture has been brought upon us by FUTURISM, a Jesuit, Rome inspired doctrine to keep our eyes off the POPE and the mystery religion of Rome.
The following videos are a must see.
The author, Alan Lamont is highly qualified to speak on this subject having researched it for many years. He reveals that Hal Lindsey, Tim Lahaye, Rick Joyner are nothing more than Jesuits wolves!
Pre-trib Rapture-Lie-Created by Jesuits of Rome
Rick Joyner - Jesuit Knight of Malta - False Prophet
LooeyNoorey 61p · 613 weeks ago
Pretrib rapture promoters like Thomas Ice give the impression they know more than the early Church Fathers, the Reformers, the greatest Greek New Testament scholars including those who produced the KJV Bible, the founders of their favorite Bible schools, and even their own mentors!
Ice's mentor, Dallas Sem. president John Walvoord, couldn't find anyone holding to pretrib before 1830 - and Walvoord called John Darby and his Brethren followers "the early pretribulationists" (RQ, pp. 160-62). Ice belittles Walvoord and claims that several pre-1830 persons, including "Pseudo-Ephraem" and a "Rev. Morgan Edwards," taught a pretrib rapture. Even though the first one viewed Antichrist's arrival as the only "imminent" event, Ice (and Grant Jeffrey) audaciously claim he expected an "imminent" pretrib rapture! And Ice (and John Bray) have covered up Edwards' historicism which made a pretrib rapture impossible! Google "Morgan Edwards' Rapture View" and journalist/historian Dave MacPherson's "Deceiving and Being Deceived" for documentation on these and similar historical distortions.
The same pretrib defenders, when combing ancient books, deviously read "pretrib" into phrases like "before Armageddon," "before the final conflagration," and "escape all these things"!
BTW, the KJV translators' other writings found in London's famed British Library (where MacPherson has researched) don't have even a hint of pretrib rapturism. Is it possible that Ice etc. have found pretrib "proof" in the KJV that its translators never found?
Pretrib merchandisers like Ice claim that nothing is better pretrib proof than Rev. 3:10. They also cover up "Famous Rapture Watchers" (on Google) which shows how the greatest Greek NT scholars of all time interpreted it.
Pretrib didn't flourish in America much before the 1909 Scofield Bible which has pretribby "explanatory notes" in its margins. Not seen in the margins was jailed forger Scofield's criminal record throughout his life that David Lutzweiler has documented in his recent book "The Praise of Folly" which is available online.
Biola University's doctrinal statement says Christ's return is "premillennial" and "before the Tribulation." Although universities stand for "academic freedom," Biola has added these narrow, restrictive phrases - non-essentials the founders purposely didn't include in their original doctrinal statement when Biola was just a small Bible institute! And other Christian schools have also belittled their founders.
Ice, BTW, has a "Ph.D" issued by a tiny Texas school that wasn't authorized to issue degrees! Ice now says that he's working on another "Ph.D" via the University of Wales in Britain. For light on the degrees of Ice's scholarliness, Google "Bogus degree scandal prompts calls to wind up University of Wales," "Thomas Ice (Bloopers)," "be careful in polemics - Peripatetic Learning," and "Walvoord Melts Ice." Also Google "Thomas Ice (Hired Gun)" - featured by media luminary Joe Ortiz on his Jan. 30, 2013 "End Times Passover" blog.
Other fascinating Google articles include "The Unoriginal John Darby," "X-raying Margaret," "Margaret Macdonald's Rapture Chart," "Pretrib Rapture's Missing Lines," "Edward Irving is Unnerving," "Pretrib Rapture Politics," "Pretrib Rapture Secrets," "Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty," "Pretrib Hypocrisy," "Pretrib Rapture Secrecy," and "Roots of Warlike Christian Zionism" - most from the author of "The Rapture Plot" (the most accurate documentation on pretrib rapture history) which can be obtained by calling 800.643.4645.
Can anyone guess who the last proud pretrib rapture holdout will be?
(Postscript: For another jolt or two Google "The Background Obama Can't Cover Up.")
[Saw the above on the net. Also Google "Catholics did NOT invent the Rapture" and "The Real Manuel Lacunza."]
Gregg · 613 weeks ago
Tracy · 601 weeks ago
My recent post WE WILL NOT FORGET - EVEN IF GOOGLE DOES!!!
Gregg · 601 weeks ago
Thank you so much for your comments. I agree, Martial Law is upon us. God bless you during this time.
Gregg
agentleiconoclast 8p · 575 weeks ago
K2B · 571 weeks ago
Gregg 57p · 558 weeks ago
Read my article Is There a Perfect Bible? to understand the history. http://greggfetter.blogspot.com/2013/07/is-there-...
God bless.
Irv · 559 weeks ago
Gregg 57p · 558 weeks ago
The Catholic did not invent the rapture, they invented the idea that it happens 7 years before Christ comes. They invented the Pre-trib rapture, that is the content of this article.
However, the Bible DOES teach the CONCEPT of a rapture, BUT only as it coincides with the Day of the Lord or Day of Atonement at the END of the tribulation (the Bible does not use the term “rapture”).
The rapture comes at the LAST TRUMPET:
For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the TRUMP OF GOD: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
1 Thessalonians 4:16-17
God bless.
LooeyNoorey · 485 weeks ago
By Dave MacPherson
John Darby, Paul Wilkinson, and Thomas Ice are among those who have flunked the Margaret Macdonald test by covering up and misinterpreting what she (as the pretrib rapture originator) actually stated in 1830!
My book "The Rapture Plot" discusses Margaret's two-part main point (lines 58-63 in her 117-line account): seeing "one taken and the other left" before "THE WICKED" (Antichrist) is "revealed."
Hal Lindsey's "The Rapture" correctly says she taught "a partial Rapture" - that only PART of the church will be pretribbed up.
Walvoord's "The Rapture Question" also describes partial rapturists as "pretribulationists," and their charts show the "church" BEFORE AND AFTER their rapture in the same way Margaret was a "church splitter." (Google "X-Raying Margaret," "Margaret Macdonald's Rapture Chart," and "Pretrib Rapture's Missing Lines.")
Both John Cardale (in Edward Irving's journal in Dec. 1830) and John Darby (in his 1853 book) described their visits to mid-1830 meetings Margaret conducted in her home. Darby's "recollection" was such a mirror of the many details in Cardale's published account 23 years earlier that I'm convinced that Darby was merely copying Cardale's details, and Darby listed all of the details except one!
Although Darby mentioned Margaret's "texts on overcoming" (the "tribulation" or second half of her main point), he deliberately omitted her emphasis on "the coming of the Lord" (rapture) as the church's "deliverance" before the "judgments coming on the earth" which all visitors, except Darby, admitted was a pretrib event (the "rapture" or first half of her main point)!
Margaret's visitors included writers for Irving's journal "The Morning Watch." Within weeks it reflected Margaret's unique and original "church/church dichotomy" ("spiritual" church members raptured and "less spiritual" church members left behind) when it saw the "Philadelphia" church raptured BEFORE "the great tribulation" and the "Laodicea" church left on earth.
Well, if Darby could be a revisionist with Margaret's words, so could Wilkerson and Ice today.
After Joe Schimmel's Good Fight Ministries produced the "Left Behind or Led Astray?" video (the greatest video exposure ever of pretribism's dishonesty-riddled history!), Britisher Paul Wilkinson savagely attacked it in an uber-unscholarly way in a video produced by the Berean Call Ministry titled "Left Behind or Led Astray? - Exposed."
In order to please his think-alike idol, John Darby, Wilkinson deliberately stopped his quotation of Margaret at line 45 so that he could omit the first (pretrib) part of her main point in order to be able to falsely declare that she advocated "a post-tribulation Rapture"!
Thomas Ice has been even more nervy than Wilkinson, his British "twin." When Ice quoted Margaret's 117-line account in the Dallas Seminary journal he omitted ALL OF HER MAIN POINT but made up for it by quoting just BEFORE and AFTER it! (Ice's "PhD" was "earned" at the unaccredited Tyndale Seminary in Texas which, according to World Net Daily, was heavily fined by the State of Texas for illegally issuing degrees - too many degrees for the Texas heat!
Finally, if Ice, Wilkinson and other pretrib escape artists love Jews and Israel as much as they say they do, why don't they want to be on earth during "Jacob's trouble" to aid and comfort Jews and others? (Some Google items related to this include "Greatest Hebrew-Christian Scholars NOT Pretrib," "Roots of Warlike Christian Zionism," and "Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty."
/ Saw the preceding on the net. Interesting, eh? /
LooeyNoorey · 482 weeks ago
THE REAL MANUEL LACUNZA
by Dave MacPherson
John Bray's 1982 booklet "The Origin of the Pre-Tribulation Rapture Teaching" claimed that 18th century Jesuit priest Manuel Lacunza originated the pretrib rapture in his 1812 work "The Coming of Messiah in Glory and Majesty." Bray stated Lacunza saw a 45-day period between a rapture and Christ's touchdown on earth - a 45-day period Bray viewed as "tribulation" days.
But Lacunza was only saying that the "day of the Lord" would be at least 45 days long - the difference between the 1290 days and the 1335 days in Dan. 12. Somehow Bray failed to note that those 45 days could not begin until the tribulation days were "concluded" (Vol. II, p. 250)!
In Vol. I (p. 83) Lacunza writes that "the nineteenth chapter [of Revelation] speaks of the coming of the Lord in glory and majesty, which Christians with one consent do wait for."
On pp. 99-100, after quoting I Thess. 4:13-18, Lacunza quotes Matt. 24:30 and then comments: "If you compare this text with that of St. Paul, you shall find no other difference than this, that those who are to arise on the coming of the Lord, the apostle nameth those who are dead in Christ, who sleep in Jesus; and the Lord nameth them his elect."
And in Vol. I (p. 113) Lacunza again quotes I Thess. 4 and Matt. 24 like this: "...He shall descend from heaven, and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we who are alive, &c. and it appears to me, that you will find St. Paul and the Gospel speaking one and the same thing: He shall send his angels and they shall gather his elect from the four winds; who can be no other than those very ones who are in Christ, who sleep in Jesus."
Interestingly, even Tim LaHaye's 1992 book "No Fear of the Storm" admits on p. 169 that "Lacunza never taught a pre-Trib Rapture!"
For more on Bray and his other groundless claims, Google "Is John Bray a PINO?," "Morgan Edwards' Rapture View," "Catholics Did NOT Invent the Rapture," "John Darby Did NOT Invent the Rapture," "Margaret Macdonald's Rapture Chart," "Edward Irving Vs. John Darby," and "Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty."
Finally, since the earliest pretrib rapture promoters were overwhelmingly anti-Catholic, it's not likely they would have adopted anything from a Catholic!
Brian Spurgeon · 330 weeks ago