Ladies and Gentlemen, The Emperor Has No Clothes



The Emperor’s New Clothes is a story about an emperor who hires two tailors to make him a set of remarkable new clothes that will be INVISIBLE to anyone who is either incompetent or stupid.

When the emperor goes to see his new clothes, he sees nothing at all— for the tailors are swindlers and there really aren't any clothes.

Afraid of being judged incompetent or stupid, the emperor pretends to be delighted with the new clothes and “wears” them in a grand parade through the town. Everyone else pretends to see them too, until a child yells out, “He hasn't got any clothes on!”

You can read the entire story here (The Emperor's New Clothes by Hans Christian Anderson).

Ladies and Gentlemen, Our President, Barack Obama has NO CLOTHES.

According to our Constitution he is, has been and will always be ineligible to be President of the United States.

Article Two of the United States Constitution states:

“NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, SHALL BE ELIGIBLE TO THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

Is Barack Obama a natural born citizen?

Definition of a natural born citizen.


Obama fails to meet this criteria on both counts:

He was born to a Kenyan father.


He was born in Kenya.

Does that mean that he is not a citizen of the United States?

No, Obama is a US citizen.  Just not a Natural Born Citizen.

People can be a citizen of the United States in one of 3 ways.


Because Obama had an American mother (Ann Dunham), he qualifies as a citizen of the United States.  However he is NOT a natural born citizen. Therefore he is not qualified to be President of the United States.


Obama Says He Was Born in Hawaii

Obama has presented a birth certificate to the American public claiming that he was born in Hawaii.

However this document was found FRAUDULENT.  After a 6 month investigation, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his “cold case posse” have concluded that Obama’s birth certification is a fake.




By his own testimony, Obama reveals that he was born in Kenya.  The following appeared on his book jacket covers before he came to prominence.





Also, before Obama’s grandmother died, she publicly acknowledged that Obama was born in Kenya.  Listen to this over-the-phone conversation with her.


Either way, born in Kenya or not, Obama still does not qualify to be President of the United States because he was born of a Kenyan father.

Some have tried to distort these facts saying that Obama was fathered by Malcolm X or others, but it is all part of a cover-up.

One thing we know for sure is that Obama’s birth certificate is fraudulent and he has no other document to offer the American people.

Ladies and Gentlemen, the Emperor Obama has no clothes!

So why does the main stream media and the Congress of the United States COVER for Obama?

I believe the answer to that is both natural and spiritual.  I’ll start with the natural answer.

Natural Reasons Why Obama’s Ineligibility is Not Discussed

No one truly knows who Obama is.  Of all public figures he is the most mysterious.  A deeper look shows that Obama began his public career as a CIA operative in Afghanistan.  He helped the Mujahideen fight off the Soviet Union Afghan invasion in the early 1980’s.  Many people are not aware that Obama speaks several languages, including Arabic.

It was during this time that Obama CLAIMS he was a student at Columbia College (1981-1983).  However, no one recalls him being there including George Stephanopoulos, Wayne Allen Rue and Bill Henner who attended Columbia during this same time.


Once Obama returned from Afghanistan he became a community organizer (1985-1988).  From late 1988 to 1991, he became a student at Harvard University, serving as President of the Harvard Law Review in his second year there.

In that Obama was a pot smoker and a subpar student (C- student) earlier in his life at Occidental College (1979-1981), it’s unthinkable that he could now enter Harvard Law School and serve as President of the Harvard Law Review— it’s most prestigious position.


How was this possible?  Where did he get the money to attend Harvard?

We can’t fully know.  All records to Obama’s so-called “Columbia” experience have been sealed by the CIA.  What we do know is that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia gave Harvard of gift of 100 billion dollars during the years Obama attended Harvard.  Could Islamic interests have purchased Obama the kind of “status” he would later use in the American political system?

An entire investigation into this was conducted by Dr. James David Manning in what has become known as the The CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial.  Many prominent figures testified during this citizen conducted trial which began the process of truly “vetting” Obama.

The transcripts to this trial can be found at the following link:

The CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial Transcripts


From Harvard, Obama went on to a law career which included teaching constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School (1992-2004).  He also served 3 terms as a state senator for Illinois during this time.

In 2004, Obama won the US Senator seat for the State of Illinois.  He resigned after winning the presidency in 2008.

Four Reasons Why the Main Stream Media and Congress Cover for Obama

Now, the question remains, “If Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States, why does the main stream media and the Congress of the United States COVER for Him?”

There are 4 reasons:

1.  Some members of Congress are complicit.

Members of Congress and the CIA are COMPLICIT in the ineligible political advancement of Obama.

In Are You Clueless: Where Our World is Headed, I showed you how our world is controlled by the Illuminati.  Certain members of Congress are complicit in that while they know of Obama’s past and ineligibility as president, they look the other way.  They do this because of Islamic pressure (their man in the White House) and because of their status in the coming New World Order.

2.  Some members of Congress are intimidated.

Other members of Congress are intimidated to keep their suspicions under wraps.  Enthusiastic members of Congress are often given “offers they can’t refuse” (from the movie Godfather)— if you know what I mean.

3.  Some members of Congress are looking out for their reputation.

Other members of Congress don’t want to sully their reputation.  How silly would they look if they started talking about the “Birther” issue.  Odds are high that they would not be reelected.  Do you remember how “stupid” Donald Trump was made to look when he began talking about the birther issue?  He is not even a member of Congress.

4.  The main stream media is controlled by Islamic interests.

Following the Rupert Murdoch “News of the World” scandal, Saudi Arabian Prince Alwaleed bin Talal gained control of a large part of the worlds news outlets including Fox News, Wall Street Journal, the New York Post and 100’s of newspapers across the world.



Of course Prince Alwaleed bin Tala makes sure there is plenty of diversity in the news coverage.

Are you a Republican?  You’ll like Fox News.  Are you a Democrat?  You’ll like CNN.

All sorts of issues are discussed on these news channels giving the impression of free speech— even issues opposing Obama.

But have you ever noticed there is one issue that is NOT discussed?  In fact it’s not allowed to be discussed.  It’s the proverbial ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM ?


What is the “elephant in the room” that can’t be discussed?

It’s that no one can discuss the BIRTHER ISSUE.  That Obama is constitutionally ineligible to hold the office of the President of the United States.

This is not by mistake.  It is by plan.  New teams have been told that they can say anything they want about Obama, except they CAN”T talk about his birth certificate.  They can’t discuss that he is ineligible for office.

Why?

Because it is the one issue that pulls the Obama presidency up by it’s ROOTS.  It is the one issue that would destroy the hopes and dreams of Islam and the New World Order.

The American Constitution stands in their way.

Therefore, the law has been laid down by Islamic ownership.  The Birther issue is off limits.

You mean Fox New’s Bill O’Reilly really isn’t “lookin’ out for me?”

No, Bill O’Reilly is looking out for his 50 million dollar a year salary.  Just ask Glen Beck who tried to bring up the issue and was subsequently let go.

Test what I’m saying.  Turn on any news channel and see if ANY news organization is even remotely talking about the birther issue.  No.  Not.  I rest my case.

Spiritual Reasons Why Obama’s Ineligibility is Not Discussed

What is the spiritual reason why no one wants to talk about Obama’s ineligibility to be President of the United States?

1.  Who Obama Is.

Some say that Obama is the False Messiah, the Antichrist of the Bible.  Is he?  I think he is.  Dr. James David Manning and others think he is.  But He doesn’t have to be.  He could simply be a forerunner of the Antichrist to come.

Some will say that he doesn’t fit the profile (see Who is Barack Hussein Obama).  But prophetically we don’t always understand the “signs of the times” like we think we do.

The Pharisees missed that fact that Jesus was born in Bethlehem.  They thought he came from Galilee.

(The Pharisees) replied, “Are you from Galilee, too? Look into it, and you will find that a prophet does not come out of Galilee.”

The reason I think Obama is the False Messiah is because he fits the timelines of Daniel and the Feasts of the Lord as I understand them (Where Are We in the End Time Timetable? and Can We Know When Christ Will Return?)

If Obama is the False Messiah it gives way to the second spiritual reason people do not speak out against Obama.

2.  There is a powerful DELUSION in the world due to the presence of the False Messiah.

The COMING OF THE LAWLESS ONE will be in accordance with the work of Satan displayed in all kinds of counterfeit miracles, signs and wonders,  and in every sort of evil that deceives those who are perishing.  They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved.  For this reason God sends them a POWERFUL DELUSION so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.

Do you fall into one of these 3 categories?

Are you a Muslim?

You have been taught to subdue the world— to establish a kingdom for your end time king.  But I tell you an even GREATER King has already come.  That King is the Lord Jesus Christ.

Why did He come?  He came to set men free from their sins.  He came to reclaim a Kingdom lost to Satan in the Garden of Eden.

This Kingdom must first be established in your hearts.  It is an INTERNAL Kingdom.  God uses it to change men from the inside out.  But Jesus will come again, a second time, to establish an EXTERNAL Kingdom.  When He does, every knee will bow and every tongue confess that He is LORD.

Therefore God exalted (Jesus) to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus EVERY KNEE SHOULD BOW, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and EVERY TONGUE CONFESS that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

My prayer is that you will come to know Him ahead of time.  I invite you to be a follower of Jesus Christ.

Are you African American?

You and I are just alike.  We are equal in God’s eyes.  The color of our skin does not alter the truth in any way.

My concern is that the black American follows Obama simply because he is black.

Black Americans have undergone great injustice in America.  Martin Luther King fought to change that.

And now, to some degree a reverse prejudice has taken hold.  White Americans feel guilty about how black Americans have been treated.

Obama hopes to take advantage of that.  He does so by shutting down any negative speech against him, calling it prejudice.  He does so by taking advantage of the hurt brought upon you by the injustices of our culture.

I would like to point out that Obama is not a black American.  I mean this in the sense that he does not IDENTIFY with your experience.  He is a Muslim raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.  He cannot possibly understand the hurt you have endured— but he will exploit it for His own good.

Whether you believe he is the False Messiah or not, isn’t this exactly how Antichrist would act?  Hide behind deception?

What I say to you is that if you support Obama because of well thought out values, more power to you.  But if you are following him simply because he’s the “first black president” and for cultural injustices— watch out.

He may not be who you think he is.

Are you politically far left?

You believe in big government.  You believe governments should help those who are in need.  I can understand that.  I want to help those in need too.

You and I probably have different ways of going about that however.  I believe people should help each other because they CHOOSE to, not because big government says they HAVE to.

But here’s my point.

I don’t believe Obama really cares about people.  People that care about people don’t LIE to get what they want.

If you have read this article and listened to the videos up to this point, you will at least see that Obama is an Emperor with NO clothes.  He isn’t eligible to be President of the United States.  He isn’t a natural born citizen.

Pretending to care about people, Obama’s real goal is to establish an Islamic Caliphate (see The Obama Agenda: The Next Sequence of Events in Biblical Prophecy).

My plea to you is to break from Obama.  Seek justice in our country based on laws associated with our Constitution.

Yes, we may have different ways in achieving social justice, but in the hands of a tyrant, neither one of us will reach our goals.

In my next post, I’ll discuss why it is unethical to vote for either Obama or Romney in the coming November 6, 2012 presidential election.

Comments (18)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 677 weeks ago

Obama's Kenyan grandmother NEVER said that Obama was born in Kenya. She said repeatedly on the taped call that he was born in Hawaii (the birther site simply cut off the tape before she was asked "Whereabouts was he born"), and she said in another interview, with the Hartford Courant newspaper that the first that her family had heard of Obama's birth was in a letter from Hawaii.)
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 677 weeks ago

Officials of both political parties say that Obama has a birth certificate on record at the Hawaii department of health. This is further confirmed by the public Index Data file, which says that there is a BC for Obama filed in 1961, and it is further confirmed by the birth notices sent to the newspapers of Hawaii in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii. Only the DOH could send those notices because the section of the newspaper was called "Health Bureau Statistics"---and both the papers and the DOH confirm this fact. And in 1961 the DOH only sent out notices to people that it issued birth certificates to, and in 1961 Hawaii was not allowed to issue birth certificates to children who were not born in Hawaii.

Another confirmation that Obama's original birth certificate exists in the files in Hawaii is the short-form birth certificate issued to Obama. The short form is generated by a clerk looking into the files and reading off the data on the document there and entering it into a computer form that generates the short form birth certificate. Obviously a document has to exist in the files for that to take place.

And Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and there is no evidence that Obama's mother traveled out of the country in 1961, which would have been extremely rare late in pregnancy in those days. (And the government of Kenya said that it did an investigation, and he certainly was NOT born there.)
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 677 weeks ago

Re "Kenyan father." Yes he does have a Kenyan father. But the meaning of Natural Born Citizen does not refer to the citizenship of the parents. It refers to the place of birth.

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is...
The reason Obama is considered a citizen of the United States is because his MOTHER was a citizen of the United States. That you think he was born in Hawaii adds NO SIGNIFICANCE. For Obama to be considered a natural born citizen, BOTH parents would have to be US citizens.

The term used to describe Obama's citizenship would be NATIVE BORN, not natural born.

Native born means that only ONE of your parents is a US Citizen. For a clearer understanding of this, please go to http://www.obamafile.com/obamanaturalborn.htm

Gregg
1 reply · active 677 weeks ago
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 677 weeks ago

Who told you that both parents have to be US citizens to be Natural Born? Who told you that even one US parent is needed to be Natural Born? Who told you that parents are part of the definition of Natural Born at all? (Oh, I see, a birther site. Well, a birther site is hardly an excellent source.)

ALL Native Born US citizens are Natural Born US Citizens. The meaning of Natural Born comes from the common law and refers to the PLACE of birth. That makes Jindal and Rubio (neither of whose parents were US citizens) and Obama (one of whose parents was a US citizen) all Natural Born US Citizens.

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

Here is an example of how the term Natural Born Citizen was used in the USA (not Switzerland) in 1803, which was shortly after the Constitution went into effect:

"Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. ...St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)

As you can see, that refers to the place of birth, not the parents. Natural Born Citizens were "those born within the state."

And here is how it was used 25 years later, by Rawle, who was a friend of several of the writers of the Constitution:

"Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."---William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)

There have now been SEVEN state courts—Indiana, Georgia, New Jersey, Arizona and Florida, and most recently Maryland and the State of Washington—and one federal court (the Tinsdale case) which have ruled SPECIFICALLY that Obama is a Natural Born Citizen due to the ruling in the Wong Kim Ark case.

Here is one: http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/...

Here is another: http://birtherthinktank.files.wordpress.com/2...
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 677 weeks ago

And here are some of the recent rulings:

ollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling: "Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency,

Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling: "Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are "natural born Citizens" for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."

Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling: "It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens."

Purpura v. Obama (New Jersey 2012) ruling: "No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here. … The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father."

Voeltz v. Obama (Florida 2012) ruling: "However, the United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States. ‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States have come to the same conclusion. [The judge cites Hollander and Ankeny]

Allen v. Obama (Arizona 2012) ruling: "Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co. , 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. … Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise"

Farrar (et al.) v. Obama (Georgia 2012) ruling: "In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Indiana Court”) addressed facts and issues similar to those before this court. [Ankeny] v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). … The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. … This Court finds the decision and analysis of [Ankeny] persuasive."

Other experts:

Who does not know that every person born within the limits of the Republic is, in the language of the Constitution, a natural-born citizen.” Rep. John Bingham, The congressional globe, Volume 61, Part 2. pg. 2212 (1869)”

“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).

“Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” (Senator Lindsey Graham [R-SC], December 11, 2008 letter to constituent)

"Despite its. apparent simplicity, the natural-born citizen clause of the Constitution" has never been,completely understood. It is well settled that "native-born" citizens, those born in the United States, qualify as natural born." It is also clear that persons born abroad of alien parents, who later become citizens by naturalization," do not." Yale Law Review, 1984.

And, of course, if any member of the Senate or House Judiciary committees had thought that two citizen parents were required to be a Natural Born Citizen, they would have said so and demanded an investigation. None did. The same goes for the 600 or so members of the US Electoral College. Birthers tried to get them to change their votes to vote against Obama following the general election in 2008. But, guess what, not one single elector changed her or his vote. The count of Electoral Votes from the Electoral College was exactly the same as the Electoral Votes in the general election.
I don't think this link worked in my previous comment. Here it is again. http://www.theobamafile.com/obamanaturalborn.htm You can get any number of judges to give their "opinion" of what natural born citizen means. That doesn't mean they are right.

In the link above you will see that it was first codified in writing in 1758 by John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. In the link I have provided you can review all the legal references that define "natural born citizen" as a child born to two US citizens.

Gregg
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 676 weeks ago

Re John Jay. He was referring to the COMMON LAW meaning of the term Natural Born. The book you are referring to, by the way, was Vattel's Law of Nations. It was not referred to even once in the Federalist Papers, nor was Vattel, but the common law was referred to about twenty times. Some of the writers of the US Constitution did read Vattel, but they read a lot of other things, in particular BLACKSTONE, and Blackstone said that the meaning of Natural Born refers to the place of birth.

John Jay wrote to George Washington suggesting that only a Natural Born citizen should be the commander in chief. Could he have possibly meant two (or even one) citizen parents? No. Why not? Because Washington would not have understood him. The book you are referring to, The Law of Nations, had not yet been translated into English with the words "Natural Born Citizen" in it yet. The translation that was around before the Constitution only said that Vattel's original French word, an "indignes" required two citizen parents. It did not say that a Natural Born Citizen required two citizen parents.

What was the meaning of Natural Born that Jay and Washington would have understood? ONLY the common law meaning of the term, the Blackstone meaning, the one referring to the place of birth.

And the Tucker and Rawle quotations by American scholars at the time confirm that that was the way Jay used the term. They use it the way that Blackstone did, and not to refer to parents.

"Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration. ...St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. (1803)

(As you can see, that refers to the PLACE of birth, not to the parents. Natural Born Citizens were "those born within the state.")

And this from 1829:

"Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."---William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)

And there are NO examples at the time of any American writer using the term Natural Born to refer to parents.

So what is the bottom line? There is historical evidence that the meaning of Natural Born comes from the common law and refers to place. There is a supreme court decision (six to two, one not voting) that the meaning of Natural Born comes from the common law and refers to place. And all the current courts have ruled that the meaning of Natural Born comes from the common law and refers to place and none nave ruled that it refers to parents.

By the way, the US Supreme Court has just turned two two appeals of the Georgia court decision that the meaning of Natural Born comes from the common law and refers to place. What does that mean? It means that the decision of the Georgia court stands and the meaning of Natural Born comes from the common law and refers to place.
1 reply · active 676 weeks ago
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 676 weeks ago

That should read: "The US Supreme Court has just turned down two appeals..."
Since Obama was born in Kenya, then he wouldn't qualify as a natural born citizen by your definition.
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 676 weeks ago

Re: "Since Obama was born in Kenya, then he wouldn't qualify as a natural born citizen by your definition. "

IF he were born in Kenya he wouldn't. But he wasn't born in Kenya. In fact, you have to be pretty nutty to think that he was.

The “born in Kenya” story is the height of the loony side of the birther movement. It is based on forgeries like that of Lucas D. Smith, and falsifications–such as the claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—when she actually said right on the same tape that he was born IN HAWAII, and she said in another interview that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama’s birth was in a letter FROM HAWAII.

Lucas D. Smith, a convicted felon, claimed that he went to Kenya and got Obama’s birth certificate at a hospital in Mombasa. But Lucas D. Smith has constantly refused to show proof that he, Smith, had ever gone to Kenya. All that he would have to do would be to show a Kenya stamp on a page of a passport, but Lucas D. Smith has refused to do that, constantly, and he has also constantly refused to say why he will not show that proof. (Moreover, his “birth certificate” uses US date formats [month/day/year] and not the day/month/year format used in Kenya.)

Laying aside for a moment the overwhelming proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, the evidence that Obama was NOT born in Kenya is also very strong. There were a grand total of 21 people who came to the USA from Kenya in 1961. Of these only seven were US citizens. And the birther myth has always been that Obama’s parents went there and returned by plane, but only one person came to the USA from Kenya in 1961 by plane and that person was, wait for it, NOT a US citizen. And Obama’s father did not go to Kenya in 1961 either (making it unlikely that his mother did, since travel late in pregnancy was rare, and even more rare without the husband going along). WND has proved with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961.

And the Kenyan government investigated the “born in Kenya” story, and found that it was not true.

“Jon Chessoni, a first secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, can’t understand why his office gets so many baseless questions about whether Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

“It’s madness,” said Chessoni on Monday.“His father, in 1961, would not even have been in Kenya. When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.””
http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged

Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate that says that he was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, and the officials of both parties in Hawaii have confirmed that fact. It is also confirmed by the birth announcement in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, which were sent to the papers only by the DOH of Hawaii.

Obama’s birth announcement appeared in a section of the newspapers called Health Bureau Statistics. As the name indicates, and as the papers and the DOH also say, ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to the Health Bureau Statistics section of the paper. And the DOH only sent out those notices for children that it had issued birth certificates for, and in 1961 the DOH was not allowed to register the births of children who were not born in Hawaii.

Oh, and there is this:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/04/kapiol
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 676 weeks ago

Continuing:

Is that all? NO there is more.

Birthers allege that the Kenyan government has hidden all documents that prove that Obama's mother went to Kenya. Well, that is possible, but not likely---such things tend to leak. But what about the US government? Did it hide its records too?

That is because, obviously, if a child were born in Kenya she or he would need a US travel document to get to the USA. We simply do not allow a child to be carried into the USA without some form of official document. (Except some are smuggled across the Mexican and Canadian borders, but Kenya does not have a land border with the USA.) And a US travel document, such as having Obama added to his mother's US passport would have required an application for that document in the US consulate in Nairobi Kenya.

That application would have been filed in multiple files, and there would have been communication about it with Washington, so it would be difficult to be lost or scrapped. And the Bush Administration was in charge of the US State Department for eight years until early 2009, so they could have found it, and if they did they would surely have shown it, and they didn't.

So, for the "born in Kenya" story to be true, both Kenya and the Bush Administration must be part of a plot. Hawaii too, of course, and that would include the former Republican governor of Hawaii, now running for the US Senate. And the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers that were placed by the DOH in the Hawaii newspapers (and only the DOH could put notices into the Health Bureau Statistics section of the papers) in 1961 would have to be fraudulent too.

And, heck, Kenya is about ten thousand miles from Hawaii, and the idea that Obama's parents had that kind of money or would spend it on a trip while Obama's mother was late in pregnancy (which was very rare in those days) and take the risk of stillbirth and Yellow Fever (which was endemic in Kenya, and a Yellow Fever shot is bad during pregnancy) is nutty in the extreme.

The bottom line: There is no proof that Obama's mother went to Kenya and it is highly unlikely that she did. The Kenyan government and Obama's relatives both say that he was not born there. If he were born in Kenya there would have to be US government documents saying that his family applied for a passport or a visa, and there isn't any. There is no INS check in for Obama or his mother (which would normally have taken place in New York, since there were no direct flights, and those files are not missing), and the birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials of both parties and the Index Data and the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers all show that he was born in Hawaii.
I think you'd have to be nuts to think he WASN"T born in Kenya. His Hawaii birth certificate has been proven a fraud by law enforcement. He personally wrote on his book jacket bio that he was born in Kenya.
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 676 weeks ago

When the government of Kenya says that it has conducted an investigation and found that Obama was not born in Kenya, and the government of Hawaii---backed by the statements of officials of both parties including the former Republican governor---says that Obama was born in Hawaii. And when there is further confirmation of the Hawaii birth certificate by the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961. And when a birther site proves that Obama's did not leave Hawaii in 1961, so Obama's mother would have had to have traveled ten thousand miles late in pregnancy ALONE----then it is irrational to believe that Obama was born in Kenya.
1 reply · active 676 weeks ago
ellenhancock's avatar

ellenhancock · 676 weeks ago

That should read: "Obama's father did not leave Hawaii in 1961, so Obama's mother would have had to have traveled ten thousand miles late in pregnancy ALONE..."
Obama, who really was born in Hawaii, as his birth certificate and the officials of both parties in Hawaii and the Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the newspapers of Hawaii by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 all show, was re-elected President of the United States last night. He won both a majority of the popular vote and a clear majority of the votes of the Electoral College.
The bible made some information to all the ladies and gentleman to protect yourself as an emperor. So that many content writing books are also providing to all the people about his information so please these services for me.
Registered, Passports, Visas, (fuhrerscheinsonline.com)Drivers License, ID Cards, Birth Cards, IELTS,TOEFL, Certificates
Contact us on========= fuhrerscheinanderungs@gmail.com
Website========&nbsp ;https://qualitydocumentsproducers.com/
WatsApp============= +1 720 534-3871 
We can produce the following items;
REAL UK PASSPORT.
REAL CANADIAN PASSPORT.
REAL FRENCH PASSPORT.
REAL AMERICAN PASSPORT.
REAL RUSSIAN PASSPORT.
REAL JAPANESSE PASSPORT.
REAL CHINESE PASSPORT.
REAL AUSTRALIAN PASSPORT
REAL GERMAN PASSPORT
AND REAL PASSPORT FOR COUNTRIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION.
REAL DRIVER LICENSE, ID CARDS, BIRTH AND VISAS.
REGISTERED AND UNREGISTERED BRITISH PASSPORT.
REGISTERED AND UNCLASSIFIED CANNIC PASSPORT.
REGISTERED AND UNREGISTERED FRENCH PASSPORT.
REGISTERED AND UNREGISTERED AMERICAN PASSPORT.
REGISTERED AND UNREGISTERED RUSSIAN PASSPORT.
REGISTERED AND UNREGISTERED JAPANESSE PASSPORT.
REGISTERED AND UNREGISTERED CHINESSE PASSPORT.
REGISTERED AND UNREGISTERED PASSPORT PASSPORT FOR COUNTRIES IN THE EUROPEAN
UNION.
Buy registered and unregistered French (France) passports,
Buy registered and unregistered German (Germany) passports,
Buy registered and unregistered Dutch (Holland / Netherlands) passports,
Buy registered and unregistered Israel passports,
Buy registered and unregistered UK (United Kingdom) Passports,
Buy registered and unregistered Spanish (Spain) passports,
Buy registered and unregistered Mexican (Mexico) passports,
Buy registered and unregistered South African passports.
Buy registered and unregistered Australian driving licenses,
Buy registered and unregistered Canadian driving licenses,
Buy registered and unregistered French (France) driver licenses,
Buy Registered and unregistered Dutch (Netherlands / Holland) Driving licenses,
Buy Registered and unregistered German (Germany) driving licenses,
Buy Registered and unregistered UK (United Kingdom) Drivers licenses,
Buy registered and unregistered diplomatic passports,
Registered and unregistered passports,
Registered and unregistered pass duplicates,
Registered and unregistered US (United States) Passports for sale,
Registered and unregistered Australian passports for sale,
Registered and unregistered Belgian passports for sale,
Registered and unregistered Brazilian (Brazil) passports for sale,
We offer high quality counterfeits for the following currencies.
EUR - Euro
USD - US Dollar
GBP - British Pound
We offer free delivery on samples at a minimum of 2000.
*200 £20 bank notes (£4000)= £200, *400 (£8000) = £350, *600 (£12000) = £450 *800 (£16000) = £500.
*400 £10 bank notes (£4000)= £150, *800 £(8000) = £250.
*200 £20 euros bank notes also available at same price.
Contact us on========= fuhrerscheinanderungs@gmail.com
Website======== https://qualitydocumentsproducers.com/
WatsApp============= +1 720 534-3871 

Post a new comment

Comments by